![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Some critics say Clinton invited the scrutiny when she joined the chorus of condemnation of Boko Haram this week, labeling the kidnapping and threatened enslavement of the girls “an act of terrorism really merits the fullest response possible.” The Daily Beast quoted an unnamed “former senior US official” dubbing as “gross hypocrisy” Clinton’s call now for swift action against a group she failed to list as a terrorist organization when she could have.īut others see politics behind the brouhaha, especially since Clinton – who continues to best any potential Republican challenger in 2016 presidential polling – often cites her focus on women’s and girls’ issues as a key accomplishment of her time as secretary of state. While what Clinton did or didn’t do about Boko Haram is getting scrutiny because of the global attention – and reprobation – directed toward the kidnapping, there are other reasons as well for the focus on Clinton’s treatment of Boko Haram. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |